Stupid question

There is no year 0, right? Only BCE 1 and CE 1. But no year 0.

So then... wouldn't 2001 theoretically mark the second millenium, not 2000?


Anonymous said...

Good point....

Taylor said...


I believe you just melted my brain.

"What brain?" you ask?

The one you just melted.

Shinichi-kun said...

well, if your being technical its more like the 6billionth millenia, lol, but people are stupid and don't realise things, what it really means is just the beginning of the year 2000 AD not the beggining of the 2000th year of AD


Wow, you really read all that? Danggg. Props! =]

Well, I see you've just had the imponderable joy of stumbling onto the blog of an 18-year-old girl who can't really describe herself in 500 words or less, such as in little text boxes like these. She didn't intend her blog to really become so much like her online diary (she was hoping it would have an interesting, helpful purpose to serve the world and all) but blogging is just kind of fun. This girl's a bit of an environmentalist and a full-tilt vegetarian, a bit of an artist who can't draw, a bit of a writer who can't find time to read, and a completely hopeless romantic. She enjoys white chocolate, coloring, wading in creeks, music, Doctor Who, and speaking in third-person when it's unnecessary like this.

Now go read the rest of the blog and meet her, if you like of course. :)